This whole chapter, to me, was about nature vs nurture. It wasn’t the same old debate that we had to
learn in history and sociology. This was
the most modern presentation of data that I have read so far. Usually the debate has to do with people
developing based off of how they were born, or how they were raised. This reading expanded personality
characterization into animal characteristics, and proved that genes have the same
tendencies across species. I thought
that the part where the author mentioned that dog owners made sense when they
said their dogs had a lot of personality was a bit of a stretch. Sometimes I feel like people are just
obsessed with their animals enough to put a personality on them.
When we were discussing the nature aspect of nature vs nurture in classes like sociology, I felt like the nature argument was based on sociological evidence whereas this chapter had more empirical evidence. For example they showed the twins who were separated at birth, and grew up in completely different environments. Once they were reunited, they discovered that they had very similar traits. It was interesting getting such a solid example of personality development.
When we were discussing the nature aspect of nature vs nurture in classes like sociology, I felt like the nature argument was based on sociological evidence whereas this chapter had more empirical evidence. For example they showed the twins who were separated at birth, and grew up in completely different environments. Once they were reunited, they discovered that they had very similar traits. It was interesting getting such a solid example of personality development.
After reviewing the chapter, I’m still uncertain about
certain characteristic factors. Freud’s
theory and the modern heredity theory cancel each other out. I can see why Freud developed his theory in
the way that he did, in the time that he did. I can also see why the empirical psychologists
strongly disagree with him, because a lot of Freud’s arguments are kind of a
leap of faith. He assumes people
reactions, and apparently (if the readings are correct), he forced his ideas
onto people. That being said, I still
think that he had some valid points, but they needed to be tested more.
One question that I kept thinking about during chapter two
was about bullying. Compensation like
imprinting and denial are used by people to protect themselves from issues that
might emotionally damage them. That made
me wonder about all of the bullies and cyber bullies that pick on people for stuff
that doesn’t matter. I always wonder if
the jerk that picks a fight is either, compensating for their own problems, or
just acting on the communal mentality.
No comments:
Post a Comment